When New York City became the national epicenter of the coronavirus pandemic, its once-sacrosanct practice of sorting thousands of children into selective public schools suddenly collapsed: The metrics that dictate admissions evaporated as schools shuttered.
Then, the city erupted in protest over the killing of George Floyd, and the fact that the proudly progressive city is home to one of the nation’s most racially divided school districts took on fresh urgency.
New York is now inadvertently running an experiment in how to operate without high-stakes admissions screens. Some hope that a looming decision on how schools will admit students into top schools this fall could lead to integration long after the pandemic ends and the protests ebb.
The city has “an opportunity to zoom back out to 40,000 feet and think about whether this system we’ve created over the last few decades serves the system and its students well,” said Stefan Lallinger, a fellow at the left-leaning Century Foundation and the grandson of the civil rights leader Louis L. Redding. “I would argue that it doesn’t.”
An admissions system that was built up over the last 20 years fell apart in a matter of weeks.
Even before schools closed their doors in March, some parents kept their children home as the virus began spreading, and the mayor nixed attendance as a measure of student achievement for the current admissions cycle. Shortly after, state standardized tests were canceled and letter grades were put on hold for most students.
That sudden shift has stirred fear and frustration among some parents who have warned of calamity if screened admissions are overhauled long term.
But other families and even Department of Education staffers say change is long overdue, even if it was prompted by two tragedies.
Over 400 department employees, most of them people of color, signed a letter calling on Schools Chancellor Richard A. Carranza to scrap most admissions screens and exams, along with other major changes.
“This is the moment to dissociate ourselves from institutional racism and to affirm that Black Lives Matter,” reads the letter, which was written as protests against police brutality swelled in New York.
Mr. Carranza has said he believes screened admissions are contrary to the spirit of public education, and drew ire from his many critics after his recent remarks that the city should “never waste a good crisis to transform a system” were reported by the New York Post.
The admissions process has endured despite the fact that elite public schools have enrolled dwindling numbers of black and Hispanic students, prompting mounting frustration from educators and parents.
And the process has remained largely unchanged even during the tenure of Mayor Bill de Blasio, who promised to vanquish inequality in city life but has not made school desegregation a priority.
New York City screens more children for admissions than any school district in the country; about a third of the city’s roughly 900 middle and high schools use some kind of requirement for admissions, typically including attendance, grades, test scores, school work and sometimes interviews and recommendations. A small number of schools use demographic requirements aimed at creating diverse student populations.
Tens of thousands of rising sixth and ninth graders spend months and sometimes years touring schools, pulling together applications and studying for exams in the hope of securing a coveted seat. Manhattan’s Beacon High School, for example, received over 5,800 applicants for 360 ninth-grade slots last year.
Critics say that the process is inherently unfair, because it privileges children whose families have the time and money to navigate the complex system and pay for test preparation or consultants, and that it discriminates against qualified but low-income black and Hispanic students.

The screening system produces selective schools that are largely attended by white and Asian-American students, though the city’s school system is mostly black and Hispanic.
In recent weeks, a debate over how to restructure admissions for the fall — and far beyond — has reached a fever pitch.
Brad Lander, a City Councilman from Brooklyn, said the city should announce a temporary admissions system for this fall and work to create permanent changes over the next year. “But it would also be foolish to double down and recommit to a set of systems that we already knew weren’t working well,” he said.
Mr. Lander helped lead an effort to eliminate selective admissions for middle schools in his district, which now uses a ranked lottery system. He and others said that other districts should stop sorting young children by academic ability.
“Trying to decide a 9-year-old’s worth completely makes no sense,” said Emma Rehac, a high school senior who is part of the group IntegrateNYC.
Screening for the city’s gifted and talented programs starts even earlier: Children can take a test for those highly competitive programs when they are just 4.
Critics of the admissions process have argued that attendance for young children in particular is more a reflection of parents’ ability to get their children to school than of students’ credentials.
And some elementary school principals have said students come to school sick in an effort to maintain perfect attendance records — which would be a public health violation in the wake of a global pandemic.
“I don’t think attendance should ever come back” as an admissions screen, said Laura Zingmond, the editor of Insideschools.org.
Some of the most selective schools have long held in-person tours, drawing thousands of parents who start lining up on sidewalks early in the afternoon — making it difficult for low-income and working families to attend. The virus may render those events obsolete, and the city may use virtual open houses to address both safety and equity concerns.
Ms. Zingmond said the city should also delay its usual admissions cycle, which typically begins at the start of the school year. “The last thing anyone needs to think about in September is admissions. Schools will have traumatized kids and teachers.”
But Elissa Stein, a local schools consultant, said her inbox is flooded with parents who believe disruptions to the usual admissions process could damage their children’s academic prospects.
“In this very stressful time when we are all undergoing new levels of anxiety, to have this whole system ripping apart in front of our eyes, and not having an answer or even some direction is causing an outrageous amount of stress,” she said.
The city’s admissions system has spawned a cottage industry of tutors and consultants; Ms. Stein charges $240 an hour for meetings.
In a statement, Mr. Carranza said the city is currently holding virtual town halls to solicit feedback from parents, and promised that the city’s ultimate decision will “properly account for the unprecedented disruption this pandemic has had in the lives of our children.”
The loudest opposition to admissions changes has come from families in one of the city’s wealthiest and highest-performing school districts, Manhattan’s District 2.
Jude Listanowsky, a seventh grade student who lives in the district, created a Change.org petition calling on the mayor to restore the previous grading system for the upcoming high school admissions season.
During remote learning, middle schoolers either pass classes or receive remedial help for incomplete courses, rather than receiving letter grades.
“We will have no motivation to perform to our best during this time of Covid,” his petition, which has garnered over 1,800 signatures, reads.
Parent Leaders for Accelerated Curriculum and Education, a group that supports gifted and talented schools and screened admissions, has been encouraging families to write to the mayor and chancellor to register their concerns.
A form letter on the group’s website accuses the city of “deliberately and cynically using the deadly Covid-19 crisis to enact an agenda that I oppose and about which my voice has not been heard.”
“In this environment that’s been created, achievement is a dirty word,” said Lucas Liu, a PLACE founder.
There is legitimate debate about the value of screening, said Sean Corcoran, a professor at Vanderbilt University who has studied New York’s idiosyncratic admissions. “What is the instructional reason we have these screens?” he asked.
Mr. Corcoran said the city should consider eliminating all screens for the coming admissions cycle, and then create a more standardized system under which all schools have to use similar, publicly available requirements, more of which should be aimed at boosting integration. He warned of a counterproductive scenario in which individual schools create their own admissions screens if the city does not act soon.
Many educators and parents believe the city can do much more than merely skirt a worst-case option.
Eric Goldberg, an elected parent leader in Manhattan, said the mayor should “send a message to the families and students who have fought and waited for reform, and to those marching in the streets, that our schools must reflect our values.”
And Mr. Lallinger said that transforming admissions should no longer be seen as an unwinnable political fight.
“There’s a lot of fear-mongering and falling into historical ways of thinking about the potential consequences of changing the demographics of a school,” Mr. Lallinger said. “This is 2020, not 1953. That’s where I’d start.”
"may" - Google News
June 11, 2020 at 04:49PM
https://ift.tt/2YiXJnO
Why 2 Crises May Finally Force N.Y.C. Schools to Integrate - The New York Times
"may" - Google News
https://ift.tt/3foH8qu
https://ift.tt/2zNW3tO
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Why 2 Crises May Finally Force N.Y.C. Schools to Integrate - The New York Times"
Post a Comment